Preventing Sexual Harassment In the Workplace

With the workplace now pushing for equality between man and woman, the former would do everything in their power to prove that they are still the stronger sex than the latter. In their desire to achieve this goal, some male employees go to the extent of making sexual advances to their female counterparts. This is where sexual harassment will come in.

It is the job of management to maintain an environment where both male and female employees can co-exist without feeling intimidated or harassed. Sexual harassment in the office is prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Known as the Federal Anti discrimination law, it also protects employees from any form of retaliation from their employers.

According to the website of The Benton Law Firm, sexual harassment encompasses such acts as inappropriate touching, engaging in inappropriate conversation, provocative gesture, or promising promotions in exchange for social favors. Sexual harassment is both a criminal and a civil offense. Title VII prohibits discrimination in all terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.

Management should then make it sure that all employees are aware of any anti sexual discrimination practices in the workplace. So how can an employer create a sexual harassment free work environment. Here are 3 helpful tips on how to promote zero sexual discrimination:

1. Put in place a clear anti-harassment policy. Management should solicit the help of a legal expert in crafting the sexual harassment policy to ensure that it conforms with Federal, state, and local laws. Have these policies placed in the employee handbook so everyone will be aware.

2. Train your employees. All rank and file employees, managers, and supervisors must be equipped with the proper training on how to detect, prevent, and reprimand violators of the policy. The training can be done annually so that employees will stay informed.

3. Define the consequences for violating the policy. All employees should be made aware of the punishment or penalty that awaits them if they violate the policy.

Preventing sexual harassment is an initiative that should start from the top management. They should lead by example and should see to it that the policies they have set forth will be followed to the letter.

Who Is To Blame After A Trucking Accident?

When industrial truckers enter a collision while driving traveling, many elements may come into play. There are many ways why the accident might occur, and there are times where the trucking firm might be held responsible for the crash and accidents of the people. A trucking firm is frequently held liable following a truck accident under the concept of “respondent superior”, which applies the obligation of the crash towards the workplace so long as the crash was unintentional and happened during operating hours.

The workplace can only be held in charge of the incident of these staff when the accident was unintentional as stated earlier. Because they are unrelated to the business enterprise or the main work intentional torts, however, may exempt a member of staff from any culpability. There are two methods a trucking company can be held responsible for their collision: through vicarious liability or negligence on the employer’s side. A truck accident lawyer could mention that it is the manager supervise and to properly retain their employees’ obligation; that is, they have the duty to ensure anyone they employ is just a driver that is secure and qualified.

They’re able to record a state to their insurance carrier whenever a driver is hurt in a vehicle incident. According to the website of Habush Habush & Rottier S.C., when the company’s compensation (through worker’s settlement) isn’t enough, they are able to record your own injury claim against their businesses or insurance company. Injury claims may also cover for that non-economic decline that’s not lined or paidfor by worker’s payment. Some states follow a tip, if you have a share of obligation for the incident, the amount of payment you will acquire could possibly be below you anticipate.

It can be very hard to determine who is truly liable for a truck accident, so long as it was not an intentional act. There are various things to consider, thus consulting with a lawyer first before declaring any injury or insurance claim is important.

When Should I Get SR-22 Insurance?

In order to know when you should get SR-22 insurance, you might first want to know what this kind of insurance first entails.

First of all, SR-22 insurance isn’t even a type of insurance policy at all – but it does come from your insurance company. This is documentation from your insurance company that states that you and your automobile are under some kind of policy and coverage. This is usually necessary for the driver in question may have had their license confiscated or suspended for whatever reason. Most known cases are cited due to instances of driving while under the influence (DUI).

According to the Habush Habush & Rottier S.C. ® website, some states that do not require SR-22 insurance while there are some states that do. It is very important that you have this particular certification of your policy with you in states that require SR-22 insurance in order to ensure that there are no more unfortunate incidents on your part that could be cause for regrettable legal action. Some states require that you file an affidavit before it can be concluded that you need not have this documentation with you anymore. It is commonly cited that drivers who are required to carry SR-22 insurance are meant to have it for around 2-3 years.

Most insurance companies can be difficult to deal with when handling this type of insurance due to difficulties that the circumstances may present. That is why it is recommended that you seek the help of experienced professionals who can help you understand what your needs are in terms of policy and coverage and know exactly what kind of certification you must have on you at all times.

If you or someone you know is currently contemplating on whether or not they should avail of SR-22 insurance, it is recommended they contact a reputable policy provider for further insight regarding their concern.

What Can Exposure to Asbestos Do?

There are many consequences to asbestos exposure but none quite as dangerous or lethal as that of mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a kind of slow-acting cancer that can take years before it is detectable. It is a rare kind of cancer, meaning treatments of it is scarce and experimental. The worst thing about it is that it can happen to anyone – all it takes is the littlest bit of exposure to asbestos, the tiniest inhalation of the wrong kind of air to change not only your life but the lives of those around you.

The most common kind of mesothelioma is one that affects the protective lining or membrane that surrounds the lungs called the pleura, thereby calling it Pleura Mesothelioma. Another kind of this cancer is one that attacks the abdominal cavity. This is relatively rarer than that of pleura mesothelioma and is called Peritoneal Mesothelioma. The third, last, and rarest kind of this cancer is the one that surrounds the membrane of the heart – and this is called Pericardial Mesothelioma.

It can be difficult to find evidence of when or how the person was exposed to asbestos since mesothelioma does take quite a long time before there is evidence of it. Contacting asbestos lawyers may be the best option to take when first diagnosed with this kind of disease as, due to their expertise with handling people who have to go through cases like this, means that they are well equipped with how to handle this situation as well as have sufficient resources to be able to get the afflicted person with the best medical resources possible.

People who have served in the military, should they have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, can file for compensation as there has been evidence of asbestos on ships or other military-grade vehicles. Construction and railroad workers are also susceptible to this disease as asbestos was only quite recently banned in 1979 and its effects can still be felt by people today.

Consequences of Unsafe Premises

It is mandated by law that if any given person or party owns a property, the premises must be kept structurally sound and safe for all who might inhabit it, in order to protect all who might enter from accidents or injury lest you become liable for any and all injuries sustained due to negligence.

This can be to things as simple as putting up warning labels if the floor is wet or making sure that the roof or the walls or the stairs won’t cave in. There are a million different ways that premises can be declared unsafe; if injury is sustained due to the negligence of the premises’ owner, immediate legal action is recommended.

Not all injury is immediately evident however as there are some consequences that are not visible to the naked eye, as is the damage done by inhalation of dangerous toxins found in paint laced with lead or present asbestos.

There is also the possibility that if the place is easily accessible but dangerous for children, the premises could be marked as an attractive nuisance as an added charge along with being proclaimed as unsafe premises. According to the website of Crowe & Mulvey, LLP, there are many different ways that could render a place dangerous, ergo unsafe, then making the pursuit of a premises liability claim as one that is validated and recommended by law.

If you have been the victim of a property owner’s negligence with maintaining the safety requirements of keeping the premises safe for habitation, then you are warranted to press legal charges on the grounds of unsafe premises against the offending party. The aftermath of having suffered through such ordeals is not strictly confined to physical damage but also financial constraints as well as emotional trauma. The offending party should be held accountable to his or her negligence and pay the dues owed to the victim as recompense and as a reminder for everyone to keep their environments safe.

The Benefits and Threats of Power Morcellators

Before morcellators were introduced in the 1990s, women who had a hysterectomy usually had to bear an abdominal incision that was, at least, six inches long, as the procedure was a major or open surgery. The entry of power morcellators into the market changed this, however, as it gave doctors and patients the privilege of opting for a minimally invasive procedure, which required four very tiny 0.5 – 1cm cuts instead. Other than the small cuts, hysterectomies (and other laparoscopic, or minimally invasive, surgeries, including myomectomy) wherein a morcellator was used also became much less painful, safer, faster to perform, lessened the loss of blood and chances of infection, and allowed a very fast recovery period.

Hysterectomy, a surgical procedure wherein the womb or uterus is removed, is the second most common surgery undergone by women in the US (the first is Caesarean section). It becomes a very necessary procedure due to:

  • Chronic pelvic pain
  • Uncontrollable bleeding during childbirth
  • The presence of oversized uterine fibroids that can cause bleeding, bladder pressure, pelvic pain, and anemia
  • Uterine prolapse, a condition wherein the uterus drops into the vagina due to the weakening of the tissues that hold it in place (uterine prolapse is usually caused by persistent coughing, straining, childbirth, hormonal changes, and obesity)
  • Certain types of cancer, such as cancer of the uterus, cervix and ovarian cancer
  • Severe pains caused by a condition called endometriosis, a situation wherein the tissues that are supposed to line the uterus grow outside of it and grow in the ovary, on the fallopian tube, or other abdominal or pelvic organ instead
  • Adenomyosis, a condition wherein the endometrium, which is the inner lining of the uterus, breaks through the uterus’ muscle wall. This condition can cause lower abdominal pressure, bloating before menstrual periods and menstrual cramps that can result to heavy periods.

Three of the best acknowledged power morcellators were the Gynecare Morcellex, the Gynecare X-Tract and the Morcellex Sigma, all of which being products of Johnson & Johnson, the leader in the manufacture and distribution of power morcellators. However, due to a safety alert issued by the US Food and Drug Administration on April 17, 2014, Ethicon, J&J’s power morcellator manufacturing unit, saw the need to suspend all sales and distribution of the device rather than cause harm on anyone.

The FDA’s communication was based on medical literature which said that, though morcellators provided multiple benefits, the deadly cancerous tissues (called uterine sarcoma) it caused to spread was a very great risk that no amount of benefits can outweigh. And though doctors and hospitals had been discouraged to use the device further, so many women have already been treated with it.

How many more women will be filing morcellator lawsuits may be hard to predict, but many more are still the expected to be filed.

GI Dangers of Using Benicar

Weight loss may be a desirable outcome when dieting or exercising, but when it occurs because your body is no longer absorbing nutrients sufficiently, you could be in for a world of hurt. As pointed out in the website of law firm Williams Kherkher, rapid weight loss can be dangerous to your health.

Weight loss is one of the side effects of using Benicar and other drugs that contain olmesartan because of a condition called sprue-like enteropathy. Benicar is primarily an antihypertension drug. The symptoms of this medical condition are very similar to celiac disease, in which the afflicted trigger an immunological response when they ingest gluten, a protein present in wheat, rye, barley, and other grains. This response systematically damages the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and over time results in what is referred to as villous atrophy. At this point, the GI tract is so damaged that the body can no longer absorb food nutrients.

In sprue-like enteropathy, villous atrophy can still develop, but it is not triggered by the presence of gluten. This has been determined in studies of several patients who presented with celiac disease symptoms but were negative for the standard test for immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody or IgA-tTG. The link between Benicar and sprue-like enteropathy was initially suggested by researchers at the Mayo Clinic which had treated 22 patients between 2008 and 2010 who had the condition and were all taking Benicar. One patient had such severe GI damage that he was hospitalized for 100 days and must now use a feeding tube.

Sprue-like enteropathy develops over time and the risk rises sharply after the first year of using Benicar, but the studies did not find the same effect in patients using other drugs in the same class (sartans, also known as angiosten II receptor blockers) or other antihypertensive drug classes. This suggests that olmesartan is unique in producing this side effect. If the condition is diagnosed early enough, the damage can be minimized.

Prozac for Pets

There once was a time when unruly pets were sent to obedience school to solve the problem rather than be medicated with powerful drugs. But once the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the marketing of Prozac (fluoxetine-based) for pets, it was a foregone conclusion that pet owners would jump at the chance of an easy fix.

Prozac is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class which gained wide popularity once it was FDA-approved in 1987 for the treatment of depression, then later obsessive compulsive disorder, bulimia nervosa and panic disorder. It remains one of the most popular mood stabilizing drugs on the market despite the numerous product liability lawsuits filed against drug maker Eli Lilly and Company for the adverse effects of Prozac on humans.

Called Reconcile, the mood stabilizing drug for dogs based on the Prozac formula, was developed and marketed by Eli Lilly and Company as a chewable tablet designed to be given once a day to a dog which exhibits anxiety or nervousness when the pet owner goes away during the day. Animal experts are disturbed by the growing trend of pet owners who prefer to drug their dogs than to spend more time with them, which would do wonders to alleviate feelings of insecurity and fear in these already much-constrained animals.

This concern is not so much a matter of the idea of a chemical stopgap; antidepressants have a notoriously long list of potential adverse reactions which are somehow mitigated in many cases because physicians consider the benefits to outweigh the drawbacks. But in the case of pets, the same side effects apply and since a diagnosis of mental illness is unlikely, there are no real benefits to the animal. There have been reports that there is a potential to exacerbate behavior problems of dogs that had been put on Reconcile.